Saturday, July 12, 2014

# 17 CCF Child Protection Unit's involvement in public arrest of Long Ven





In response to the Phnom Penh Post article this weekend regarding the very public arrest of Long Ven in Siem Reap. (The full article is to be found below)

Journalist Will Jackson mentions in his article that:

 “McCabe previously worked for Australia’s National Crime Authority”

He fails to mention that Mc Cabe, a former Australian Police officer from Victoria, was extradited from Cambodia and did two years in jail in Australia for drug offenses. A pertinent fact, I would have thought, for a journalist to acknowledge in an article such as this. This is either very sloppy journalism on Jackson’s part or the article has been written by a partisan determined to show Mc Cabe in a positive light.

A concerning aspect of the sting operation orchestrated, in part, by the Cambodian Children’s Fund’s Child Protection Unit, is the Phnom Penh Post’s publication of a photo of Long Ven’s arrest. Questions:

- Who invited the media to attend the arrest? Was it James Mc Cabe, Scott Neeson or another member of the team present for the arrest?

- Is it appropriate that the Phnom Penh Post publish a photo of a man who has not yet even been formally charged with a crime but who, at the time the media was invited to witness the arrest, was only a ‘suspect’?

The easy answer to this question lies in the following sentence in Jackson’s article:

“He (Long Ven) has since been charged with procuring children for the purposes of prostitution.”

OK, so Long Ven has been charged. However, in the eyes of the law, he is innocent until proven guilty. If it transpires that Long Ven is innocent, will the Phnom Penh Post publish an apology? And even if it does, what damage will have been done to Long Ven’s reputation that cannot be repaired?

Jackson finishes his article with:

The difficulty in prosecuting child abuse in Cambodia is exacerbated by the ease with which perpetrators can pay their way out of rape charges.”

The same applies, of course, to anyone who may wish to have someone falsely charged with rape (or attempted rape), arrested and sentenced on the basis of allegations - backed up by no facts or evidence at all.  

As for the police being in receipt of financial assistance from the Cambodian Children’s Fund,  imagine if, in Australia (or the US or most European countries), an under-funded police force were to receive training and funding from a private business! It is unthinkable, for obvious reasons. Alas, the unthinkable all too often is the norm in Cambodia!

Is it wrong, unfair, to refer to CCF as a business? I think not, given that Scott Neeson earns $10,000 a month. It is a very lucrative business for Scott since this $10,000 does not include all the perks that come with the job.  There is nothing wrong with running a business, of course, but when you earn 83 times the salary of one sector of your employees (teachers) questions will arise as to the integrity and fairness of your business practices and model.

The pertinent question here, however, is:

“Should a business such as CCF be providing funding for the Cambodian police?”

Or, if you wish to think of the Cambodian Children’s Fund as a non-profit NGO:

“Is it appropriate for an NGO, whose funding of a Child Protection Unit is dependent on the arrest and conviction of criminals, to fund the police whose job is to arrest such criminals?”

A partial answer is to be found in a quote from Jackson’s article:

“Ear Sophal, the author of Aid Dependence in Cambodia: How Foreign Assistance Undermines Democracy, said ideally recurring costs such as petrol and food should be covered by the government. “Generally, I would say that it is not appropriate to dedicate resources for such expenses if one is interested in sustainability,” Sophal wrote in an email. “But if one is interested in expediency, then anything goes. You might as well pay the police to do its work if it leads to the results you want.”

Ear Sophal’s reference to “the results you want,” is disturbing.

Given that Scott Neeson and James Mc Cabe have gone out of their way to capitalize on the arrest of Long Ven on the Cambodian Children’s Fund Facebook page, there would be considerable egg on their faces if Long Ven were to be found not guilty.

From a public relations point of view (to justify the CPU $1.5 million budget) the result Neeson and Mc Cabe want, need, is for Long Ven to be found guilty. For Long Ven to be found innocent would result in loss of face, public humiliation for Neeson and Mc Cabe and possibly the loss of some of the CPUs funding.

It could be argued that the Cambodian Children’s Fund now has a vested interest in the conviction of Long Ven. A dangerous precedent!

And what if Scott Neeson or James Mc Cabe want, for whatever reason, to ‘get a result’ that suits them from a PR point of view? Or in order to silence a critic? Or to punish an ‘enemy’? What is to prevent them, since the police are on the CCF payroll, from paying for the result they want? Nothing, as far as I can see!

This is not an accusation - merely an observation; a question.

“They’re doing work that really needs to be done,” said (Eric) Meldrum. “They’re not doing really complex cases, so a little bit of money goes a long way.”

So, who is investigating the ‘complex cases’ Does the attempted rape of a 3 year old girl qualify as ‘complex’ or ‘not complex’? The CPU?

“For many, it was attractive to think the ends justified the means. “But that is a slippery slope: What if only bribes resulted in crimes against children being solved?” said Sophal.

Another question that Sophal could ask is:

“What if bribes can be paid to arrange for the arrest, charging and conviction of an innocent person whom either Neeson or Mc Cabe might consider to be a nuisance, or worse?”

Any close association, relationship, between a criminal former Australian policeman and the Cambodian police should, I believe, be viewed with some suspicion.

If there is substantive evidence that Long Ven is guilty he deserves to go to prison. If there is no evidence that stands up in court I trust that the Phnom Penh Post publishes a front page apology.






Police arrest Long Ven (striped shirt), the director of the Underprivileged Children School
Police arrest Long Ven (striped shirt), the director of the Underprivileged Children School. GEORGE NICKELLS

Multi-agency task force targets child rape

Sitting at a metal table in Siem Reap’s drab single-room Serious Crime Police office this week, the three-year-old spoke in quiet monosyllables.
Next to her, child support officer Som Vathna, from the Phnom Penh-based Child Protection Unit (CPU), was gently asking her questions, while sitting opposite, the unit’s legal assistant Sok Sopheak Monica took notes. The girl’s father was also there, watching.
Her wispy brown hair tied up in a bun and her tiny hands in her lap, the girl confirmed what her parents had already reported. They told the police that the day before she had been sexually assaulted by her
17-year-old cousin at their village about 17km outside Siem Reap.
James McCabe (left) working with officers from the Child Protection Unit
James McCabe (left) working with officers from the Child Protection Unit.GEORGE NICKELLS
“She was playing at her cousin’s house when he took her upstairs and tried to rape her,” Monica said after the interview. “When it was over, she ran home and told her mother.”
A partnership between the Cambodian Children’s Fund and the Cambodian National Police, the CPU was established to assist national and provincial officers in cases of serious assault, rape or homicide of minors in the hope that more child abuse offenders in the country could be brought to justice.
With the backing of the high-profile and well funded charity, the CPU has the cash, experience and resources that Cambodia’s chronically under-funded police lack.
Assistance ranges from little things such as providing phone cards and petrol money to training in advanced investigative skills and coordinating major operations.
A team from the CPU was in Siem Reap this week as part of a multi-agency task force brought together to arrest Long Ven, 33, who goes by the name “Waha”, the director of an unregistered English language school suspected of renting out pupils for sex in exchange for donations.
Ven was apprehended by plainclothes police at the Siem Reap FCC on Monday. Shortly afterwards, dozens of students under the age of 13 were interviewed by child support officers at the Underprivileged
Children School in Sambat Village, while nine older students were found at an apartment rented by Ven in Siem Reap. He has since been charged with procuring children for the purposes of prostitution.
The CPU’s operations manager, James McCabe, said it was unusual for his team to be investigating sex trafficking. “We’re involved because it’s a major operation that crosses provincial and international boundaries and requires additional resources,” said McCabe, who previously worked for Australia’s National Crime Authority. “But, while it’s horrible to say, child rape cases really are our core business.”
McCabe, 45, who started up the CPU, revealed that the three-year-old’s case was the unit’s 104th child rape investigation this year. Total cases number 118. The unit takes a “holistic approach to child rape, assault and homicide” from initial investigations through to victim support and prosecutions.
A child abuse victim
A child abuse victim. GEORGE NICKELLS
“Our main priority is to minimise trauma to children and the best way to do that is to get good physical evidence so the courts don’t have to rely on child testimony,” said McCabe. “We don’t want them having to go over their experience over and over again.”
Along with demonstrating advanced policing techniques on the job, the CPU, which employs 34 staff including three foreigners, also runs training courses.
“So we focus on training, capacity building and teaching investigative techniques,” he said.
So far it seems to be working. The CPU has an arrest rate of about 80 per cent and all 17 of the suspects who have gone to court have been found guilty. “The sentences have ranged from two to 20 years,” added McCabe.
At the headquarters of the Cambodian Children’s Fund in Phnom Penh, executive director Scott Neeson said the CPU was something of a departure from the charity’s usual projects, which have previously
focused on education, accommodation and health care for youngsters.
“In terms of vision, it had always made me very angry that there were so many cases of child rape you came across anecdotally, with so many families and children, and no one ever got charged. Money would change hands,” added Neeson, a former Hollywood film executive turned children’s rights advocate who founded the Cambodian Children’s Fund in 2004.
“I had a very stereotypical, judgemental view that it was about making money [for the police].
A young boy looks out of the window at the Underprivileged Children School in Sambat Village
A young boy looks out of the window at the Underprivileged Children School in Sambat Village. GEORGE NICKELLS
“It was when Jim [McCabe] presented the model [for the CPU] of what the issue really is [that I got on board] and it’s [that the police are] under-resourced and under-trained. As well the opportunity to not only bring about a higher arrest rate but also show a deterrent which has never been [there] before.”
The program should also see a long-term improvement in arrest rates. The CPU was like “capacity building on steroids”, said Neeson.
Eric Meldrum, a former British police force detective turned anti-exploitation consultant, is supportive of the work the CPU is doing as the Cambodian police are so under-resourced that even basic assistance will make a huge difference. “They’re doing work that really needs to be done,” said Meldrum. “They’re not doing really complex cases, so a little bit of money goes a long way.”
But not everyone is convinced that the police should be receiving outside assistance. Ear Sophal, the author of Aid Dependence in Cambodia: How Foreign Assistance Undermines Democracy, said ideally recurring costs such as petrol and food should be covered by the government. “Generally, I would say that it is not appropriate to dedicate resources for such expenses if one is interested in sustainability,” Sophal wrote in an email. “But if one is interested in expediency, then anything goes. You might as well pay the police to do its work if it leads to the results you want.
“Such partnerships are not unheard of, see for example [disgraced anti-trafficking crusader Somaly Mam’s NGO] AFESIP and its close association with the police. [But this is] problematic at times, to say the least.”
For many, it was attractive to think the ends justified the means. “But that is a slippery slope: What if only bribes resulted in crimes against children being solved?” said Sophal. “Would that be justifiable? The most important thing is putting an end to impunity, and that will result in crimes being solved fairly quickly.”
Pupils were allegedly rented out for sex at the Underprivileged Children School
Pupils were allegedly rented out for sex at the Underprivileged Children School. GEORGE NICKELLS
But Sophal’s criticisms were rejected by Neeson. “If it comes down to providing a couple of phone cards and some money for petrol, we’ll do it,” he said. “I feel like it encourages rather than replaces government investment.”
Meanwhile, the program has support from the highest levels in the police administration. Mok Chito, chief of the Interior Ministry’s Central Justice Department, said the CPU and the police were cooperating well. However, he talked down the impact of the CPU on arrest rates.
“We were still on duty before the CPU existed. Even though our investigating is still limited, we are able to work it out,” he said. “Even though [the police] could miss some sources, we were still able to solve about 70 per cent of cases.”
When there was previously a child murder case, police from the Ministry of Interior went down to work with provincial officers, which was expensive. “Sometimes we don’t have enough money [but] we still go down to work it out,” said Chito.
So far, one of the CPU’s biggest achievements has been the development of the Battambang police force. “We don’t need to go out with them on jobs any more, the standard of their investigations is so good now,” said McCabe.
If the success of Battambang can be replicated in other provinces, the CPU may be able to shut in six or seven years. “That’s how I measure our success,” said McCabe. “When we’re not needed any more.”
The difficulty in prosecuting child abuse in Cambodia is exacerbated by the ease with which perpetrators can pay their way out of rape charges. Read more here.
For a case of the Child Protection Unit in action click here.

40 comments:

  1. I was having an argument with a friend about the Cambodian Children's Fund when she told me to look at a story about the CCF Child Protection Unit. SHe thought to story was clear evidence of the value of the CPU. Here is the link. Take a look at it:

    http://media.smh.com.au/featured/hollywood-hotshot-to-charity-chief-4967285.html

    The interesting part of it is where Neeson says, "Jim brought in 40 Federal Police". Is Jim, James Mc Cabe? My guess is 'yes'. So here's an interesting thing: James Mc Cabe, the only Australian policeman ever extradited from a foreign crime, a criminal who has done two years in jail in Australia for his crimes, brought 40 Federal Police to Cambodia to help solve a crime!

    This is very hard to believe. No, it is impossible to believe. Neeson is lying. God knows why he would tell such a whopping lie but having done so I find it hard to believe anything he says. He is not a Hollywood hotshop. He was the vice president of marketing. The is a hotshot in his own mind only and in the publicity he generates having gullible Hollywood movie stars acting as advocates for CCF.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you mean 'hotshot', not 'hotshop' but hey 'hotshop' works too given how much money Neeson earns. I wish the media would stop referring to Neeson as a Hollywood hotshot. The highest he climbed the creasy pole was to Vice President of marketing. This does not qualify him to the title 'hotshot'. He was just another film exec, probably quite well paid who decided that he wanted to do something else. And good on him. The problem is that Neeson needs to perpetuate the myth that he has given up this wonderful life to rescue children from the dump. $10,000 a month is not a bad wage so please, any representatives of the media who might be reading this, lay off talking about Neeson as if he has made a huge sacrifice. He is just another NGO who has given up another job to be here. Strip away the hype and assess CCF as an NGO and not as the project of a self-sacrrificing Hollywood hotshot. I don't know if CCF is kosher or if it is another Somaly Mam scam but it would sure be helpful if Neeson answered a few questions.

      Delete
  2. I wonder if Sumner Redstone, the owner of CBS, Paramount and MTV and a huge financial supporter of the Cambodian Children's Fund, has any idea at all of the rumours swirling around CCF and of Neeson's refusal to answer questions put to him by journalists, sponsors, donors or anyone else interested in how CCF spends the millions that flow through its bank accounts?

    How many kids are there in any one room? Are all the former CCF staff who say between 15 and 20, lying? Is anyone other than Ricketson asking questions? Why isn't Neeson being held accountable for the way CCF is run?

    How many Somaly Mam's do there need to be before NGO's are held accountable? What a mess this country is. Maybe Cambodia would be better off if we all just packed our bags and left it to the Cambodian people to sort the mess out. We sure as hell aren't helping, other than to relieve the government of any obligation to take care of its own citizens and to make Cambodians dependent on us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "It takes a thief to catch a thief." Old English proverb. Can't really see why anyone is getting so excited about the fact that James Mc Cabe is (or was) a crook! Who better than a criminal knows how the minds of other criminals work. From what I have read he and his Child Protection Unit are doing a great job. Lay off him. Give him a break.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hang on there! Whether the CPU is doing a good job or not I don’t know. All that I can be sure of (reasonably sure of) is that Will Jackson sees it as his mission in life to shaft Steve Morrish. He was sacked by the Cambodia Daily for lying about Morrish in an article. Now he is working for the Phnom Penh Post, a publication with lower ethical standards.

      In one of Jackson’s three related articles this weekend (‘Blue glow’ helped trap child rape victim’s attacker) Jackson writes: “…one of the detectives strayed the suspect’s hands with luminol, a chemical used to detect traces of blood. From under the man’s finger nails a tell-tale blue glow emerged. That forensic evidence would make all the difference, said James Mc Cabe, the head of the CPU. (The suspect) was charged and will end up being convicted. What was a weak case is now very strong.”

      It may well be that the blood under the finger nails of the suspect is that of the girl’s. If so, forensic testing will reveal this and he will be found guilty. On the other hand, the blood under his nails might have got there for any number of quite legitimate reasons. It is up to a court to decide where the truth lies. It is not up to an investigating policeman (oops, former policeman) to decide before a court case (and to announce it publicly) that “he will end up being convicted.”

      If CPU funding is tied to the number of cases solved, the number of sex offenders jailed (as is the case with one other well known NGO engaged in investigating crimes against children), innocent men (and women) could wind up in jail as a result of circumstantial evidence.

      Delete
  4. Scott Neeson's media spinning wheel clocking big miles fooling the world into funding his kiddy empire . this latest round of spin showing his fan club what a true hero he is. makes me want to puke! brother Norman is back in Cambodia living his double life lusting young Khmer bar girls.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think that what Scott Neeson's brother gets up to in Phnom Penh is of any relevance as long as he obeys the law and doesn't 'lust after' underage Khmer bar girls.

      Delete
  5. The question is, and it is one that Neeson should answer, how much money does CCF pump into the Cambodian police - either as direct cash or in terms of materiel? If, as Neeson and Mc Cabe insist, CCF's investment in the Cambodian police is minimal, not problem. If it is substantial, a big problem as this could be seen as constituting a bribe. Come on. Mr Neeson, share with us in the NGO community just how much you are paying the police to be part of their investigations?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Does Scott Neeson have permission from the parents to publish photos of their children on his Facebook pages and CCF website? Just asking.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ricketson your a whacko wanker. Crawl back under your rock you fucking rock spider.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. One of the more articulate contributors to Cambodia 440 I take it!

      Delete
  8. If you bothered to check your facts Mr Ricketson you would discover that CCF pays its teachers $200 a month. Not $120.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Neeson is paying his teachers @200 a month that is certainly a vast improvement on $120 a month. It means that he is only earning 50 times more than his teachers. If this is true why doesn’t he simply admit it. Indeed, why doesn’t he simply declare what everyone earns at CCF? Why does he refuse to answer questions?

      I read today a statement made by a former Prime Minister of Australia, Malcolm Frazer, in relation to Australia’s current Minister for Immigration – a man who refuses to answer questions. As I read it I could not help but think of Scott Neeson:

      “Secrecy is completely inadequate for democracy but totally appropriate for tyranny. If the minister will not inform the public, then we are within our rights to assume the worst.”

      Delete
  9. I should have added to my last comment that I believe ALL NGOs should publish the wages they pay their employees (and themselves) online.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What I have been told, on pretty good authority, is that CCF pays its domestic staff only $90 a month. It would sure as hell be good to know where the truth lies regarding wages. I have tried to get some information regarding wages but Neeson won't say and his staff are sworn to secrecy.

      Delete
    2. $90 a months the figure former staff have told me. Present staff won't talk. I don't know how Neeson can justify his $10,000 a month when his staff are living on about half what the ILO recommends as the basic wage. The problem is that donors and sponsors to the Cambodian Children's Fund do not know facts such as these. All they have access to is a website that sings Scott's praises and Facebook - which also sings Scott's praises: the Hollywood hotshot who gave up his job marketing Hollywood blockbusters to get by on a mere $10,000 a month!

      Delete
  10. 90% of staff are paid $90.00 per month and living in terrible slum conditions.
    while CCF collects $140.00 for every child per month from its sponsors.
    over 1300 children living under lock & key in their overcrowded run down institutions. video cameras throughout to keep a watchful eye.
    Run by western men , yeah nothing to worry here folks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are there any women in the Chile Protection Unit? Given that most of the victims the CPU would have to deal with are girls I hope that there are trained women with experience, expertize, in matters relating to child sexual abuse. Are there, Scott? You are reading all these comments! Will you answer any of the questions that are arising here? It seems not. I believe readers, sponsors and donors are entitled to draw certain conclusions from your silence.

      Delete
    2. I have heard, on pretty good authority, that Sumner Redstone kicked in $400,000 to the Child Protection Unit last year. I wonder if he would be so generous if he knew that the CPU was run by a convicted criminal! If I were Redstone, or Heather Graham I would be distancing myself from the Cambodian Children's Fund until Neeson starts answering some questions. Id you are reading this, Mr Redstone or Ms Graham, do you think it right that you are supporting an NGO in which the head honcho (Scot Neeson) pays himself $10,000 a month whilst his domestic staff earn less than one 100th of what he earns? This is $90 or $100 a month but Mr Neeson will neither confirm nor deny the amount. The same applies for teachers. One quote is $120 a month (and this is from former teachers) and another is $200 a month. Even if he is paying is teachers $200 a month is it appropriate that he should earn 50 times the salary that his teachers earn.

      Delete
  11. I have spoken with one family whose daughter spent two years with CCF. The parents told me that CCF had offered to both take care of their daughter and to lend them money. They were happy with the arrangement at first. The money was very helpful. They were not happy to have very limited opportunities to have their daughter visit them in their home (they both worked in the Phnom Penh dump) and asked CCF to return their daughter. CCF told them that to get their daughter back they would first have to repay the money loaned to them by CCF. They had spent the money and there was no way they could find the money to repay the loan. I asked them if they had placed their thumb print on an agreement of any kind with CCF. They said yes. I asked them if they had a copy. They said no. The CCF representative had kept it and not provided them with a copy. When I asked them if they were sure that the document they had signed had anything to do with the loan made to them they did not know. They cannot read or write. I have recommended to these parents that they take their complaint to Licadho. I do not know whether they did or not and I am no longer in Cambodia and so cannot check. They had never heard of Lidadho and from my conversation with them, with a Khmer woman translating I got the impression that they had no idea where to go with their complaint about not being able to get their daughter back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My own experience, which covers 3 NGOs now, is that regardless of whether or not there is a formal 'contract' between an NGO and the poor people being helped, the poor and illiterate (and, of course, powerless) Cambodians have no idea of their rights. Or, if they know or suspect that they have rights they also know that they are powerless to exercise them. Corrupt NGOs can simply pay the relevant person within the Ministry of Social Affairs - which will declare that the child in question does not have a home to return to that is safe etc. The combination of corrupt NGOs and a corrupt Ministry of Social Affairs results in parents being powerless to get their children back when they realise that their children have, in effect, been stolen. What these parents do not know is that their kids are being used to raise massive amounts of revenue for the NGOs who present them to the world as 'orphans'. Orphans are a very saleable commodity to kind-hearted and generous donors and sponsors. When these 'orphans' get to be 16, or 17, and have lost the cuteness factor that makes them so saleable, they are turfed back pout into the world they came from. Most of the girls I know who have been turned out of NGOs at afe 17 have a baby by age 18 and two babies by age 20 - the NGOs having taught them nothing about birth control. I hope, one day, when Cambodia is a proper functioning democracy, that the 'stolen generation' of kids will take out class action suits against all the NGOs involved in exploiting them for their own financial gain.

      Delete
    2. Yes, one day some enterprising young Khmer lawyer who was stolen by an NGO will collect together other victims of NGO perfidy and sue them for unlawful removal under Article 8 of Law on Suppression of Human Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation - in which the Definition of Unlawful Removal is:

      "The act of unlawful removal removal in this act shall mean to:
      1) Remove a person from his/her current place of residence to a place under the actor’s or a third persons control by means of force, threat, deception, abuse of power, or enticement, or
      2) Without legal authority or any other legal justification to do so to take a minor person under general custody or curatoship or legal custody away from the legal custody of the parents, care taker or guardian.

      Article 9: Unlawful removal, inter alia, of Minor

      A person who unlawfully removes a minor or a person under general custody or curatorship or legal custody shall be punished with imprisonment for 2 to 5 years."

      Such a lawsuit would necessitate both a good lawyer and a judiciary that is not corrupt. The good lawyers are on their way and there are some signs that there are a few (though not many) judges in Cambodia who are not corrupt. Watch this space.

      Delete
    3. Honestly who the hell do they think they are ? Who are these people
      are they some type of twisted cult ? Why are western men running institutions in Cambodia. How do they get these children, are they giving the parents money to hand over their children ?
      l heard of 2 brothers in a NGO who's parents house burnt to the ground loosing everything. the boys pleaded with the NGO to let them go help their family , it took the NGO over 1 month before they would release them for just a few days . when the boys returned, NGO manager asked the boys about the value of the house and contents , the boy replied in total everything including the house $500.00 the manager replied WOW your family must be rich ... take a guess which NGO

      Delete
    4. "Who the hell do they think they are?"

      A good place to start finding an answer to this question would be to talk to the girls working in bars on street 51 and street 136 - especially the young ones. Shown them some photos and ask them if they have seen these men before. Track down some women who no longer work the bars but once did and ask the same question.

      Delete
    5. They have slowed down lately but ask any of the girls from a few years ago and show them photos. You'll see their faces light up in recognition. Fringe benefits! Did a little deeper Mr Ricketson and find out which Aussie NGOs working with kids also run girlie bars in Phnom Penh.

      Delete
  12. OMG this is sick no wonder he is hiding under a rock .

    Kat CA

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sumner Redstone
    CBS Corporation Headquarters
    51 W. 52nd St
    New York
    NY 100196188

    19th July 2014

    Dear Mr Redstone

    Do you trust Mr Scott Neeson?

    I did, until recently. Let me explain.

    I have been a regular financial contributor to the Cambodian Children’s Fund for many years. When I heard that Mr Neeson had employed a convicted criminal, James Mc Cabe, to run his Child Protection Unit I had my doubts. These did not stop me from giving money though. I reasoned that maybe the best way to catch criminals is to employ someone who knows how the criminal mind works.

    Then I heard Mr Neeson had employed another policeman to run the Child Protection Unit, Mr Alan Lemon, who had also been kicked out of the Australian police force. This was too much for me and I stopped my contributions. I felt betrayed.

    Why are two crooked cops running the Child Protection Unit? Then I heard that Mr Neeson had been paying James McCabe while he was doing two years of a four year jail sentence in Australia. If this is true, whose money was going to pay Mc Cabe? Yours? Do you know about Mc Cabe’s criminal record? Do you know about Alan Lemon being kicked out of the Australian police force?

    The straw that broke the camel’s back was when I went to the Cambodian Children’s Facebook page to ask the questions I am asking here only to find that it is now blocked to all comments. It used to be open. Now it is closed! Why? Is it because Mr Neeson does not want anyone asking him any questions?

    Mr Neeson may have been a Hollywood hotshot once but now it looks like he is using his marketing skills to sell himself as some sort of superhero while at the same time not answering any questions or even allowing sponsors like me to make comments on the Cambodian Children’s Fund Facebook page.

    I thought you should know these things if you do not already as I have been told that you have given a lot of money to the Cambodian Children’s Fund.

    Given Mr Mc Cabe’s criminal past you will understand I hope why I am writing this letter anonymously.

    Yours sincerely

    Emily H

    ReplyDelete
  14. I am going to play the devils advocate and give Scott Neeson some credit for a moment. If he has in fact paid money to McCabe whilst he was in gaol and has now hired him to run the CPU unit, when there are far more qualified and ethical better candidates available, then there must be more to this saga. Without having any evidence, but knowing what type of sleazy character McCabe is - I would guess that McCabe has something over Neeson and this is why Neeson feels that he has had to pay money to McCabe. There is no other explanation - why would Neeson risk everything he has built with CCF and pay McCabe using CCF funds whilst he was in gaol. If that got out it would ruin Neeson. And now when CCF appears to be flourishing why would Neeson risk hiring a convicted criminal who more importantly was a police officer when he committed serious crimes. This doesn't make sense, even if Neeson was an idiot, you would hope that he had some sense to know that both of those acts spell disaster for his beloved CCF. I don't think he has a choice and has to hire McCabe - and McCabe is the reason why!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In the absence of answers to questions put to Scott Neeson, conjecture such as this is inevitable.

      The problem here, and it is not confided to Scott and the Cambodian Children's Fund, is that NGOs are not accountable to anyone for anything - in Cambodia or the country they hail from. They can, particularly in an essentially lawless country like Cambodia, behave as they choose and there is no-one, no government body (either in Cambodia or Australia, in this case) to ask questions and demand answers. This culture of impunity is one ripe to be exploited by unscrupulous NGOs such as Brisbane-based Citipointe church's 'SHE Rescue Home' and its financial backers, Australian-based Global Development Group.

      It will all end in tears, of course. NGOs such as Somaly Mam can only get away with scams and lies for so long before the truth catches up with them. Unfortunately, in the meantime, poor and powerless Cambodians will be exploited by some NGOs in their efforts to get generous (but naive) sponsors and donors to part with as many dollars as possible 'rescue' materially poor children from their materially poor parents by rebranding them as 'orphans' or victims of one thing or another.

      Delete
  15. “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”

    Dietrich Bonhoeffer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Whose silence? Neeson's?

      Delete
    2. My reading: Neeson's silence, his refusal to answer questions is not 'evil' but does raise the further question of, "Why not?" Then there is the silence, the turning of a blind eye, by all those who know that Cambodian children are being removed from their families under the most questionable of circumstances by NGOs that are making a lot of money in the process. Neeson's $10,000 a month (tax and expense free) is a lot of money. Even if he hd been a Hollywood hotshot (and not just 2nd in charge of marketing), so what! I imagine that there are many very competent and very good NGOs who could be earning more in another profession. They have chosen (as Scott did) to help poor Cambodians and their previous salary is not relevant to the job they are doing now - either well or badly.

      Delete
  16. I only got half way through this article before giving up. Firstly, there appear to be no Australians involved. Secondly, whilst two cleaners appear to have confessed to one crime, the rest seems to be conjecture. Remember Arthur Miller's THE CRUCIBLE and other instances over the years of mass hysteria regarding child sexual abuse in kindergartens ,day care centres and so on.

    There is a very good feature film about all this entitled THE HUNT: "This is a disturbing depiction of how a lie becomes the truth when gossip, doubt and malice are allowed to flourish and ignite a witch-hunt that soon threatens to destroy an innocent man's life. Lucas is a highly-regarded school teacher who has been forced to start over having overcome a tough divorce. Just as things are starting to go his way, his life is shattered. An untruthful remark throws the small community into a collective state of hysteria. The lie is spreading and Lucas is forced to fight a lonely fight for his life and dignity."

    Leaping too soon to conclusions can lead to innocent people having their lives and reputations damaged unnecessaarily.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "NO COMMENT" from HEATHER GRAHAM

    I have not yet received a response from Sumner Redstone but I did hear back from Heather Graham’s publicist, Lindsay Galin.

    MY NOTE TO HEATHER GRAHAM


    “Dear Ms Graham

    I am a journalist currently doing research into certain allegations that have been made in relation to the Cambodian Children's Fund.

    I wonder if you have any comment to make about the letter Mr Ricketson wrote to you and which he published online at:

    http://cambodianchildrensfund.blogspot.com/2014/06/some-questions-that-heather-graham.html

    best etc”

    RESPONSE

    “Emily - I'm Heather's publicist. Off the record, we are not commenting on this.

    Best,
    Lindsay”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd be tempted, Emily, to ask Ms Galin if she wishes to comment 'on the record'? If your investigations uncover anything that mine have not been able to please feel free to make contact with me at jamesricketson@gmail.com

      Delete
  18. Just read this on the CCF website:

    "The Phnom Penh Post has a feature story on our Child Protection Unit. Please have a read.

    Reporter Will Jackson gives a balanced view of the CPU, with those who agree and those who disagree with our approach.

    No-one disagrees with the results - 80% arrest rate and 100% conviction rates."

    I disagree with the results, Mr Neeson. This is sheer and utter bullshit! Produce some evidence in support of such a statement. You won't, because you can't. This is just media spin. Whether this guy is guilty or not I do not know but for you and your criminal associate James Mc Cabe his arrest was mainly a photo opportunity for you. As for Will Jackson's 'balanced' view, you've got to be kidding. Is Jackson on the CCF payroll like McCabe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tell disagree with or question the results Scott is quoting. (He is, after all, a marketing guy!). If these results were true I suspect it would make his CPU the most successful unit of its kind in the world and, as a result, some journalist would have picked up on it and seen it as an incredible story.

      But let's say that Scott's figures are right. Given that the Cambodian police and courts are corrupt, what would such a figure actually mean in terms of guilty parties going to jail for crimes they have committed?

      Another question: If Scott Neeson and James' McCabe's 100% conviction rate is accurate, could they afford to see their success rate lowered by this man walking free for lack of evidence? Given Scott's close relationship with the police, it would certainly be very easy for him to do all in his power to see that the man is convicted - regardless of the evidence. Let's not kid ourselves that the Cambodian justice system is one in which the guilty go to jail and the innocent walk free.

      I wonder if there have been any further developments in this case that I have not read of whilst in Australia?

      Delete
  19. How many Khmer women are there working in the CCF Child Protection Unit?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll add this to my list of questions to ask Scott the next time I write to him. He won't answer, of course. He is hoping that if he ignores me, ignores Emily, ignores other journalists asking these kinds of questions, that we'll just give up. Yes, some will but other (including me) will just keep asking them until we get answers of one kind or another - if not from Scott, then from others in a position to know what actually goes on behind the scenes at CCF, as opposed to what appears on the CCF website and Facebook page.

      Delete
  20. Hi, Guys, this is sia she is suffering from Aplastic Crises which means here bone marrow is not working for those who do not know what is the work of your bone marrow in the human body. Bone marrow produce red blood cell white blood cells that fight infections, So every 4th day she is been injected with external white blood and red blood by this process she can survive only till 3 or max 6 months I am no one of hers still willing to help her because they need urgent 20 lakh Rs for operation.

    I am proud of her dad that he is not like others who is not worried because she is a girl this is for every girl and those fathers and every brother who loves their sister and all mother lets come together and help her if we can donate even 10 rs per person, the population of India is currently 1,350,438,098 they can collect a good amount of funding via us and also that girl would survive. We can make her smile come back and that's a damn good feeling contribute at least of 10rs https://bit.ly/2KQtz6b
    You can find all details about her on above-given link thanks and god bless her

    ReplyDelete